Man Builds Bomb with Post-Airport-Security Materials
This video has started to make the rounds. I've seen it posted on Gizmodo, Reddit, and more. I wanted to make a few comments...on the comments.
The chemistry and setup is very straight forward. This demonstration could be described as a "simple" example by a non-determined individual. However, many are misunderstanding the implications on our actual safety and the TSA's purported goals..
"It's just a firework."
"Well, it wouldn't harm anyone except for some ringing ears."
"that explosion has way more bark than bite."
First, we've all heard of people making dry ice bombs with two liter bottles. It's a similar method, in a plastic container, and no fire. Here's the latest example of a dry-ice bottle-bomb arrest in LA. (It was done for fun, and just happened to be at the airport.) Nevertheless, the charge is possession of a destructive device, and he faces up to 6 years in prison. So to the people who argue the "FRAGGuccino" isn't dangerous, the LAPD disagrees with you, and says this about the less dangerous bottle bombs "This is a serious pipe bomb filled with shrapnel; it is a destructive device.” There was also a fatal bottle bomb incident in LA in 1992.
Second, I don't know much about the type of mug used in this video. What I do know is that the container makes a huge difference. No one makes play-doh bombs. The containers strengths and it's ability to hold pressure are important factors - think pipes and pressure cookers. I also know that I own two Thermos brand mugs made of stainless steel, are airtight, and seal VERY well. I wouldn't be deathly afraid to approach either of these containers if I knew they were under pressure. If two-liter bottle plastic shrapnel is fatal, I don't want to take my chances with stainless steel. Am I concerned about FRAGGuccino on my next flight? No. I already know I'm not safe from a determined individual. However, I take cold comfort in the low statistical probability of being harmed by a terrorist. While this isn't the most powerful IED I've ever seen, I think we should acknowledge the proof of concept and examine the differences between security and security theater.
The chemistry and setup is very straight forward. This demonstration could be described as a "simple" example by a non-determined individual. However, many are misunderstanding the implications on our actual safety and the TSA's purported goals..
"It's just a firework."
"Well, it wouldn't harm anyone except for some ringing ears."
"that explosion has way more bark than bite."
First, we've all heard of people making dry ice bombs with two liter bottles. It's a similar method, in a plastic container, and no fire. Here's the latest example of a dry-ice bottle-bomb arrest in LA. (It was done for fun, and just happened to be at the airport.) Nevertheless, the charge is possession of a destructive device, and he faces up to 6 years in prison. So to the people who argue the "FRAGGuccino" isn't dangerous, the LAPD disagrees with you, and says this about the less dangerous bottle bombs "This is a serious pipe bomb filled with shrapnel; it is a destructive device.” There was also a fatal bottle bomb incident in LA in 1992.
Second, I don't know much about the type of mug used in this video. What I do know is that the container makes a huge difference. No one makes play-doh bombs. The containers strengths and it's ability to hold pressure are important factors - think pipes and pressure cookers. I also know that I own two Thermos brand mugs made of stainless steel, are airtight, and seal VERY well. I wouldn't be deathly afraid to approach either of these containers if I knew they were under pressure. If two-liter bottle plastic shrapnel is fatal, I don't want to take my chances with stainless steel. Am I concerned about FRAGGuccino on my next flight? No. I already know I'm not safe from a determined individual. However, I take cold comfort in the low statistical probability of being harmed by a terrorist. While this isn't the most powerful IED I've ever seen, I think we should acknowledge the proof of concept and examine the differences between security and security theater.
Labels: bomb, chemistry, government, security, TSA
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home